Nutrition Consensus Project
Comments and questions – email roc@ordman.net
SUBJ: consensus
You are at the Nutrition Consensus Project site, as opposed to the Nutrition Investigator site, is designed to help you decide what supplements are worth taking to increase your healthspan. Content is provided by experts with all opinions justified by links to published scientific literature. Organization and newsletter are produced by Nutrition Investigator ProfRoc. Donations to support this non-profit project are welcome.
HERE IS THE ORGANIZATION OF THE REST OF THE SITE:
1A: Categories of supplements
1B: scorecards expert and everyone: and public preferences for nutritional supplement ingredients
1C: introduction: How to use this site
1D: disclaimer
1E: Complete list of nutritional supplements used by members
1F: Consensus Newsletter Index : index of date of newsletters sent, including a search command for all newsletter
1G: Search command and instructions for searching web site and for nutrition on the internet
1H: How to evaluate products, comments on specific products and companies, and links to specific companies
1I: Rules for Website sponsors (donations to site, allowed to link to website and display they are a corporate sponsor but not revealed at website
LEVEL 2: Pages at level 2 will have 5 to 30 boxes. Each level 2 box has a link to main evaluation of a specific nutrient.
Amino Acids Biologics Chemicals Experimental Herbs Minerals Nutraceuticals Pharmaceuticals Spices Vitamins
LEVEL 3: Specific nutrients: Each level 3 page will have the main evaluation of a specific nutrient, with an essay with many links for citations of scientific articles throughout the internet. At the bottom, there will be links to level 4, additional pros and cons. e.g. Vitamin C
LEVEL 4A: Pros A. Pros with citations for the specific nutrient. e.g. vitamin C Pros
LEVEL 4B. Cons s with citations for the specific nutrient. e.g. Vitamin C Cons
Amino Acids Biologics Chemicals Herbs Minerals Nutraceuticals Pharmaceuticals Spices Vit
